Center for Trustworthy Technology

Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs)

Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) are emerging as effective medical tools due to symbiotic integrations between their designs and artificial intelligence (AI). While the concept of BCIs has existed for decades, since the early 1900s, the scientific breakthroughs necessary to achieve high-performance BCI only recently matured. Modern BCI devices comprise invasive and non-invasive sensors to record brain activity while software algorithms decode complex neural data and provide feedback mechanisms to translate digital commands back to the brain. 

The most commonly explored use cases of the device include medical applications in neural prosthetics, including experimental systems that translate neural activity to language. However, the potential impact of BCIs extends further than its medical applications. Several leading BCI startups, including those in clinical trials, are exploring the use of the technology in entertainment and gaming. 

However, expanding BCI use cases also leads to growing ethical challenges and dilemmas. Our Centre’s Point of View (POV) paper, Rewiring Reality: How Brain-Computer Interfaces (BCIs) are Redefining Human-Computer Interactions, introduces these dilemmas in hopes of initiating a productive conversation regarding the future of neuroethics and its place in developing advanced neurotechnologies. Mariagrazia Squicciarini, the Chief Executive Officer of Social and Human Sciences at UNESCO, emphasizes the need to address these ethical implications in an insightful foreword that centers on human rights, dignity, and fundamental freedoms in the development and deployment of BCIs. She calls for a thorough investigation of these technologies, particularly when considering the potential benefits of BCIs in society to those of all social and economic classes. UNESCO’s recent mandate to define the ethical guardrials of neurotechnology renders this conversation timely and necessary. 

The paper calls for building trust between innovators and users, bridging a gap between advanced engineering and user protection. Fundamentally, BCI systems should be ethical by design. One of the most pressing issues is the privacy and security of highly personal neural data. As the technology becomes increasingly sophisticated, this data could reveal intimate details about an individual’s identity, mental state, and even thoughts. Robust safeguards will be required to prevent the unauthorized access, misuse, or unintended disclosure of sensitive information. There are also risks of malicious hacking, given that many BCIs rely on wireless transmission and cloud storage of data. The POV paper considers these and other technological limitations 

Another ethical consideration centers around autonomy and consent. BCI systems should enhance but never replace an individual’s ability to evaluate specific decisions and choices unique to each individual. Additionally, users must retain free will to make informed decisions about whether to adopt or discontinue the use of BCI systems. 

To ensure the ethical and trustworthy use of BCIs, global communities must engage in multi-stakeholder dialogues grounded in a shared commitment to upholding human rights, dignity, and autonomy. With continued responsible research and innovation, BCIs could usher in a new era of human-technology interaction that expands the boundaries of society’s existing biological and cultural limitations. 

Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) are emerging as effective medical tools due to symbiotic integrations between their designs and artificial intelligence (AI). While the concept of BCIs has existed for decades, since the early 1900s, the scientific breakthroughs necessary to achieve high-performance BCI only recently matured. Modern BCI devices comprise invasive and non-invasive sensors to record brain activity while software algorithms decode complex neural data and provide feedback mechanisms to translate digital commands back to the brain. 

The most commonly explored use cases of the device include medical applications in neural prosthetics, including experimental systems that translate neural activity to language. However, the potential impact of BCIs extends further than its medical applications. Several leading BCI startups, including those in clinical trials, are exploring the use of the technology in entertainment and gaming. 

However, expanding BCI use cases also leads to growing ethical challenges and dilemmas. Our Centre’s Point of View (POV) paper, Rewiring Reality: How Brain-Computer Interfaces (BCIs) are Redefining Human-Computer Interactions, introduces these dilemmas in hopes of initiating a productive conversation regarding the future of neuroethics and its place in developing advanced neurotechnologies. Mariagrazia Squicciarini, the Chief Executive Officer of Social and Human Sciences at UNESCO, emphasizes the need to address these ethical implications in an insightful foreword that centers on human rights, dignity, and fundamental freedoms in the development and deployment of BCIs. She calls for a thorough investigation of these technologies, particularly when considering the potential benefits of BCIs in society to those of all social and economic classes. UNESCO’s recent mandate to define the ethical guardrials of neurotechnology renders this conversation timely and necessary. 

The paper calls for building trust between innovators and users, bridging a gap between advanced engineering and user protection. Fundamentally, BCI systems should be ethical by design. One of the most pressing issues is the privacy and security of highly personal neural data. As the technology becomes increasingly sophisticated, this data could reveal intimate details about an individual’s identity, mental state, and even thoughts. Robust safeguards will be required to prevent the unauthorized access, misuse, or unintended disclosure of sensitive information. There are also risks of malicious hacking, given that many BCIs rely on wireless transmission and cloud storage of data. The POV paper considers these and other technological limitations 

Another ethical consideration centers around autonomy and consent. BCI systems should enhance but never replace an individual’s ability to evaluate specific decisions and choices unique to each individual. Additionally, users must retain free will to make informed decisions about whether to adopt or discontinue the use of BCI systems. 

To ensure the ethical and trustworthy use of BCIs, global communities must engage in multi-stakeholder dialogues grounded in a shared commitment to upholding human rights, dignity, and autonomy. With continued responsible research and innovation, BCIs could usher in a new era of human-technology interaction that expands the boundaries of society’s existing biological and cultural limitations. 

Related Blogs

Scroll to Top